Friday, November 12, 2010

Horror Movie Reviews (Part 2)

   Here are seven more films that I watched in honor of Halloween. Some are spooky, others are ooky, but only one was my favorite film of the fall. Read on to discover the exciting film I hail as the Halloweeniest of all. 
Village of the Damned
(1 and 1/2 stars)
   All I knew going into this film was that it was a John Carpenter flick. I was happily surprised to see Christopher Reeve and Kirstie Alley on screen. Unfortunately, my happiness gradually deflated as the two of them weren’t enough to give this film the added oompf it needed. You see, Village of the Damned was missing a very critical ingredient in order to be good... oompf. The film was never terrifying. It was only moderately suspenseful at times. Worst of all, it was made in 1995, but felt like it was from the early 80’s. The children in the movie did some horrible things; however, I wanted to see them do more. Their actions were petty compared to how oompf filled they could have been. 
   The Breakdown: The film had potential, but fell flat due to a mediocre script that lacked a healthy serving of scares. It’s watchable, just not very memorable.
Wolf Creek
(2 stars)
   This movie would be entirely forgettable if it wasn’t for John Jarratt’s portrayal of Mick Taylor, a friendly Aussie on the surface who has a twisted dark side. He comes off as likable and fun. Somewhat reminiscent of a crazy uncle. It is him alone, who makes Wolf Creek a chilling tale. 
   The three main characters are your typical early twenties peeps who are tormented in an infinite amount of horror flicks. In this adventure, they are driving across Australia and have car trouble. They quickly find help from Mick and don’t think for a second that he is something other than what he appears. With a fair amount of suspense, the film keeps the tension high. Will our main character’s stay alive? Can they escape from the middle of nowhere? What will Mick do next?
   Even with Mick as such a strong character, the story fails as it divides towards the middle of the film. It focuses entirely on two of the main characters and omits the third one almost entirely. Once the two characters’ stories are finished, it jumps back to the third main character and ends the movie with them. To me, this felt odd. I think the editing should have spliced the two stories closer together to keep the action moving and tension raised to an even higher hair raising level. 
   The third main character’s story ended up being far weaker than the other two characters’. It felt like an afterthought. A poor epilogue about a character who ended up being the least interesting in the entire movie. It was as if the writer didn’t know how to end the film and forgot about this third character until the night before shooting the film began. Granted, this was based on a true story, the writer should have taken more liberty with the content, in order to make for a better movie by credits end.
   The Breakdown: See it specifically for John Jarratt. He is a disturbing villain and steals every scene he enters. There are some truly terrifying moments. Just don’t be surprised when the movie trails off into an unsatisfying end.
The Descent Part 2
(3 and 1/2 stars)
   A worthy sequel to the first film. It continues almost exactly where The Descent left off and follows a group of rescuers back into the home of the blind cave dwelling flesh-loving humanesque creatures. 
   The circumstances of the sole survivor from the first film going back into the caves with the rescue team is extremely far fetched. I found it hard to believe that the local law enforcement would force a woman who just got out of the caves and has amnesia, back into the nightmarish realm which she barely escaped the first time around. Obviously, time is of the essence to find any possible survivors. Nevertheless, that situation is listed under ludicrous in my upcoming novel, Nonsensicalities in Filmdom.
   Once we the viewers descend back into the caves, the film becomes as claustrophobic inducing as the first one. It is also quite unsettling to rediscover the bodies of some of the women who we were familiar with from before. Part 2 features more scares, even more hold your breath moments, and perhaps one of the most memorable final scenes in any horror film. Where The Descent ended anticlimactically, The Descent: Part 2 sets the two survivors in a room with a group of our blind cave dwelling flesh-loving humanesue creatures as they devour their lunch. Get past this room and they are home free. Fortunately, these creatures can only hunt by sound. Unfortunately, the two survivors must be as silent as air. What plays out, is a scene so intense and exhilarating, you easily lose yourself in the moment. It is a finale that is definitive, climatic, and twisted. 
   The Breakdown: A must see movie for any fan of edge of your seat horror flicks. Never once does it cross the line of being excessively gory. It relies more on the fear of being trapped and lost in the dark with bizarre creatures lurking about. If you enjoyed the first film, you’ll also be an admirer of this one.  
The Exorcism of Emily Rose
(3 stars)
   An engaging film that focuses on the aftermath of an exorcism that has gone wrong. Father Moore (Tom Wilkinson) is accused of neglecting the “possessed” girl’s needs; therefore, ultimately causing her death. The film is a courtroom drama led by Erin Bruner (Laura Linney) and tells Emily Rose’s story through flashbacks during the trial and from Father Moore himself. 
   I believe the film would have been more effective if it was told in real time, as Emily Rose was experiencing the devil’s hold on her. By telling her story in short vignettes, I was spooked during the scenes, but knowing the final outcome (i.e. who lives and who dies) takes a great deal of the terror out of the film. The courtroom scenes ultimately got in the way of the much more interesting story. I did not want to be the outsider looking in. I wanted to be a part of the action. I wanted to know more about Emily Rose.
   Jennifer Carpenter was fantastic as Emily Rose. She is an actress who can play deeply distraught and emotionally unstable extremely well. She demonstrated this throughout the film and in many episodes of the television show, Dexter. It was a shame that she did not have more screen time. She was by far the most interesting character and yet, she was kept at a distance.
   The Breakdown: A griping tale that is based on true events. It is definitely a film to see and will keep you sucked in until the very end. Despite too much focus on the courtroom drama as opposed to Emily Rose herself, the film is still effective, especially thanks to an amazing cast.
Rogue
(4 stars)
   A giant killer crocodile in Australia traps a boat full of tourists on a small island. With night approaching and the tide rising higher with each passing minute, the tourists must find a way to make it back to the mainland without alerting their new friend. Naturally, there will be plenty of nail biting moments that will leave your heart pounding and nails unattractively short. 
   This film takes a simple story and makes it work exceptionally well by fully developing all of the characters without excessive backstories. I felt like I knew the characters based on minor details and interactions in the beginning of the film. This helped me forge a connection to them  and worry about them when they became the target of croczilla. I wanted to see them escape. I wanted all of them to survive because they were not poorly developed two dimensional characters. The film still would have been intense if it was a group of college students trapped by a crocodile; however, with a good cast and characters that people can relate to, the film becomes more intimate and harrowing when the normal believable characters are thrown into a terrifyingly surreal situation.
   The final confrontation between Pete (Michael Vartan) and the crocodile is insanely intense and highly imaginative. It features one of those “Oh my God! I can’t believe that just happened!” moments. Needless to say, it is a rare satisfying end to a horror/suspense film. I was so into the scene that I almost shouted at the screen. Silly me, as if my shouting would distract a croc while it is in hunt mode. 
   The Breakdown: A crocodile hunts a boatload of tourists. Great characters, intense scenes in and out of the water, and an epic finale. In my honorably humble opinion, it is a must see flick and my favorite Halloweenesque film that I watched in the fall of 2010. 
Addams Family Values
(2 and 1/2 stars)
   Da da da dun, snap, snap. Da da da dun, snap, snap... Sorry I couldn’t resist. The Addams Family are irresistibly fun and this film, for the most part, is as well. A brilliant cast helps to bring out the quirkiness of this eccentric clan. Although the film is not as strong as The Addams Family, it is an enjoyably dark humor-filled sequel. 
   Speaking of dark and humor-filled, I could have done without the unfunny, pastel loving Joan Cusack. She was as annoying as everything else she appears in. Quite frankly, I liken her to that wonderful sound of nails scratching down a school blackboard. Fortunately, in this film, she played the villain, so my dislike towards her worked in the film’s favor. Not to mention, Raul Julia, Angelica Huston, and the ridiculously amazing Christopher Lloyd as Uncle Fester, helped to alleviate the pain of seeing Joan Cusack throughout the duration of the film. 
   The Breakdown: An enjoyable film to watch. Don’t expect too much from it and it won’t disappoint you. The Addams Family cast should easily keep you entertained. Nothing quite like an oddball goth family to bring humor into your average, ordinary, mundane life. 
Trick or Treat
(2 stars)
   Four short stories intertwine to create several scares that take place on Halloween night. It is a film loaded with tricks up the wazoo and a few treats scattered about. Be warned, these tales are less about the fun of candy and more about deceit and murder. 
   The first story features a couple getting home from a night of Halloween fun. Their home quickly turns into a murder scene after creepy kid with a potato sack over his head teaches one of them the true meaning of Halloween. In another vignette, a twisted principle carves a  special pumpkin with his son. The interaction between Steven (Dylan Baker) and his son (Connor Christopher Levins) is hilarious. This is followed by a group of kids playing a nasty prank on a girl, mainly because she is different. Then a group of four women lure dates to a Halloween party and treat them to a unique campfire dinner. This is by far the weakest of the stories, especially since it features Anna Paquin. Does anyone really think she is good? The final story is the strongest and connects to the kids who play a trick. It features the fantastic Brian Cox as a cranky old man who gets a visit from creepy kid with a potato sack over his head. The scene in his house is intensely terrifying and thrilling to watch.
   By films end, I wanted more of the kids and Brian Cox story. I think a whole film focusing on them could be much stronger than a film broken up into short stories. I would also be interested in seeing an entire film with Dylan Baker as a serial killer principle. So much potential for full length stories and so much aggravation over wasting an entire story on Anna Paquin. I wonder what the writer was thinking. “Hmm... I have this flat, uninteresting imitation of a story. I’ll stick it right in the middle of the film and maybe people won’t notice how lousy it is. Especially if it features women wearing skanky outfits.” Yep, that was most likely his train of thought. 
   The Breakdown: Overall the movie accomplishes what it set out to do, which is to tell spooky stories that take place on Halloween night. It is a fun movie to watch. I like the idea of the short stories because it allows for several spooky tales to be told in one viewing; however, the weaker stories stand out and ultimately debilitate the film as a whole. As does each of the stories being too short. I was left wanting more from all of them. With the film only being 84 minutes, there was definitely room to expand on the stories and potentially strengthen each of them. 

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Horror Movie Reviews (Part 1)

   Ah, the great dilemma of what to watch now that the ghouliest, most monsterific month out of the year has come to a close. With the end of Halloween, we are left with the faint echoes of zombies stomping, vampires biting, and witches cackling... or are we? There are some great horror movies to be seen during and after the most frightful time of the year. Just because individuals aren’t dressing up in cheap costumes and acting like silly willys doesn’t mean that we need to give up on  these creepy, disturbing, and slashtastic movies. So if you still have a taste for the undead, I present you with my reviews of the horror flicks that I viewed over the past couple of months. 
   I know first hand that one could easily be flabbergasted by the plethora of spine tingling movies that exist in our world. Sadly, most of these flicks that flock under the guise of horror films emit such a foul stench, that they can barely be considered films at all. Some horror movies like to gratuitously torture their characters, which is supposed to be “scary.” Strangely, I’m always left disgusted rather than spooked. Other films have such little character development and rely heavily on the killings of teenagers in the woods that I wind up yawning for a prolonged period of time. Needless to say, my jaw hurts after my yawnfest. I’d prefer to be scared stupid. Maybe even pee a wee bit in my pantolones. 
   Despite the many, many, many cheap, poorly written, acted and directed horror films, there are ones that redeem the genre. There are good films out there that keep the viewer on the edge of their seats without relying on gratuitous torture or shallow characters who die a painfully graphic death. These films are the ones I seek out. The ones that I devour when I unearth their wondrous secrets. They may be in small supply, but they do exist. I assure you, I have seen some. So without further adieu, I present you with movies to watch and movies to stay far far away from. 
Cloverfield
(3 stars)
   This film is shot as if someone had a digital camera throughout the entire movie and was running along with the action. The video tape was recovered after all the mayhem occurred and that is the film we the audience are experiencing. It feels like it could be a ride at Universal Studios where the seats move as you watch the film. It is fun, different and cool to see done on a large budget for a change. I enjoyed being a part of the action. Unfortunately, the ending left me unsatisfied. Thankfully there was enough awesomeness (ie, giant creature, one building collapsing into another, headless Statue of Liberty) to make up for it. 
   The Breakdown: Suspense is guaranteed. Big effects are guaranteed. Most importantly, fun is guaranteed. Cloverfield isn’t a masterpiece, but it is a thrill ride! 
Candyman
(0 stars)
   Painfully bad film. Maybe it was freaky in 1992, but this film did not age well at all. Very few scares. The Candyman came off as corny and I’m not referring to candy corn. I speak of stale boredom worthy corn that you wouldn’t even imagine inserting into your mouth. I really don’t get why it’s scary if a homicidal killer from the 1800’s haunts one character’s head (Virginia Madsen), but somehow manages to kill people in real life. Then this character appears crazy, saves a baby, there are bees that come out of the killer’s mouth, and... and.... I can’t go on. 
   The Breakdown: Never see this film unless you are nostalgic for a bad nineties horror film. Then see it and you can come to me afterwards and I will laugh in your face for having wasted precious moments of your life that will never return.  
The Crazies
(2 stars)
   Well, it wasn’t as crazy as it could have been. The casting was great and the action at times, intense. Especially when Judy (Radha Mitchell) was strapped to a gurney and a psycho farmer was killing people with a pitchfork. With little story, it was mainly about running away before either the crazies killed or the military completely destroyed the small town. The ending, like many horror films, left me unsatisfied. Of course it leaves it open for the possibility of a sequel, but the sequel seems like it would be much more interesting than this film. Especially due to the hinted choice of location for “The Crazies 2.” So after viewing this film, I am left wondering why they didn’t make the more interesting film, the first time around. 
   The Breakdown: It’s a good watch; however, don’t put it on the top of your list. The title of the film is slightly misleading. It should be called “The Docile Crazies.”`
Drag Me To Hell
(2 and 1/2 stars)
   Drag Me To Hell has everything that you want to see in a Halloween film. There is a creepy old gypsy woman who places a curse on Christine (Alison Lohman), terrifying and hilarious scenes with our lead character being tormented, and of course psychics battling the devil spirit who is trying to drag Christine to the depths of hell. 
   Christine is a sad character who is battling for a promotion. As a viewer I was rooting for her, even when she had to make a tough decision at her job. She is someone who does not deserve to be cursed and yet she finds herself in the most unpleasant of pickles. I think it is her genuine pleasantness, which makes her struggle with an old gypsy woman and the devil spirit who has come for her that much more harrowing. Her meekness as the victim enhances the audiences’ connection to her as a character that they can relate to or feel for.  
   The Breakdown: This highly entertaining film will satisfy your horror movie taste buds and teach you the most valuable of lessons. Always, give creepy old woman what they want. Especially if they beg.   
The Exorcist
(4 stars)
   After all of my 23 years frolicking about on this earth, I had yet to see the scariest movie ever made. Never being that much into horror movies until recently, there wasn’t a desire to go out and watch it. Thanks to my Fiance, I now completely embrace horror movies for their wonderful ability to scare the living daylights out of me. That is, if they do what they are supposed to do. 
   Upon viewing The Exorcist, I was amazed at how terrifying the movie still was. After all these years, it is more frightening than most of the horror films produced today. Witnessing a young girl (Linda Blair) become the devil and in one scene spew out curse words while stabbing her genitalia with a cross, then telling her mom to lick it, left me spooked. The combination of a possessed girl, her psychotic actions, and the R rating, allowed for this film to get under my skin and leave me creeped out to the tenth degree.
   Ellen Burstyn was heartbreaking as the distraught mother  who is desperately trying to seek help. With no scientific options left, she turns to her faith. It is her emotional distress, which grounds the movie, acting as a doorway into how we the audience should feel about an innocent child becoming possessed. 
   I believe this film works so well because it plays so close to everyone’s deepest fear, a loved one contracting a devastating illness (in this case, becoming possessed) that there is no cure for. The “illness” takes the person over so much so, that you can’t even recognize them physically or mentally. It is like they are someone else entirely. Mix in Satin, and you’ve got a deadly brew on your hands. One that people will still be talking about 30+ years later. 
   The Breakdown: If you haven’t seen this film, run out and see it immediately. It will brighten your day.

Slither
(1 star)
   Minor laughs and dreadfully bad character development. It may be a horror comedy, but if I don’t give a hoot about any of the characters, then there’s no point to the movie. Nathan Fillion was a waste. His character was given nothing of note to do and essentially just walked or ran through the film. Elizabeth Banks was great as the distraught wife whose husband is the first to turn into the slither creature. Unfortunately, the film fell flat due to it’s mediocrity. It merely existed. 
   There were a couple memorable scenes. The woman who couldn’t stop eating was sad, but kind of funny at the same time. The teenage girl who gets attacked by the slugs in the bathtub, was intense. Especially when her slug possessed family try to kill her as she is trapped in a car. Little kids as zombie-like creatures equals hilarity.
   The Breakdown: Great potential wasted on lackluster plot, boring characters, and not enough laughs and scares for a horror comedy. If it’s on TV watch it, but there is no need to seek this film out.
The Stepfather
(4 stars)
   This forgotten gem from 1986 delivers equal part story, character, and horror/suspense. A man marries into families, which ultimately disappoint him for one reason or another. Then he sees fit to brutally kill them, change his identity and move on to the next unsuspecting family. Disturbing and impossible not to be sucked into. 
   Perhaps I’m partial to the homicidal maniac at the film’s center; however, Terry O’Quinn does give a chilling performance that makes Lost’s Man in Black look tame. We know that he is a murderer from the first scene and this keeps things tense throughout the rest of the film as he moves on to his next family/victims. He seems to be genuinely nice and at times I even like him. Yet, little absurd outbursts kept creeping in to remind the audience of his insanity and keep the tension rising. It was especially twisted when he accused a boy of rape when he kissed his stepdaughter or when he had a “talk” with his stepdaughter’s therapist.
   The Breakdown: This film has everything a Halloween movie needs to have. From the sick serial killer to the brutal deaths, it features a psycho who doesn’t hide behind a mask and gives the viewer someone more chilling than Michael Myers or Jason, a villain grounded in reality. Where other films seem far fetched, this has the right mix of absurdity and realism to make it believable. 
28 Weeks Later
(2 and 1/2 stars)
   Oh the sequel. Trying to cash in on the original film’s success. Often times it’s a lackluster imitation of a film that didn’t require any additional story. In this case, 28 Weeks Later wisely leaves the original cast in their own movie and tells it’s own story. With all new characters, the only connection between the two films is the outbreak of the rage virus and the setting, England. 
   After 28 weeks, the rage virus has been contained and the U.S. military begins to move the survivors back into safe sections of London. Of course, something goes wrong and we have another outbreak. Cue mass killings and crazed, bloody people. 
   The first half of the movie does a great job of developing characters that we like and ones who disgust us for their cowardice actions. Then instead of maintaing the story and the great characters that inhabit it, the film abruptly turns into a “run for your life or we are going to die!” flick. Don’t get me wrong, there are some memorable scenes during this section of the film. Most notably when U.S. snipers are killing everyone in their sights and when the main characters find themselves in a pitch black subway tunnel. The only thing to guide them is the night vision sight on a sniper rifle. One word... cool!
   The Breakdown: Despite it’s shortcomings, 28 Weeks Later is a film to see. It starts with great potential, but trails off into a cliche. Still, this is enough to carry the film to the  traditional horror flick finale. All these elements combine to make a film that warrants at least one viewing. 
American Werewolf In London
(1 and 1/2 stars)
   I wasn’t that impressed with this film. My ears had received news that this was a truly scary flick injected with a healthy dose of humor. Alas, my ears had deceived me and my eyes read reviews that rattled on  about “one of the scariest movies ever made.” I suppose my hopes were raised too high for a dated 1981 film.
   Don’t get me wrong, I thoroughly enjoyed the werewolf transformation scene and parts of the film; however, I didn’t understand why or how David (David Naughton) was able to communicate with his dead friend and people he mauled to death. So in addition to becoming a werewolf, he could talk to people who were killed by werewolves? That pushed things too far in my opinion. Some of the funniest dialogue came from his conversations with dead people, but at the expense of making an already far fetched story even more far fetched. It leapt into another stratosphere of far fetchidity that no werewolf could ever retrieve it from hokeyness. 
   The Breakdown: A slow paced film that relied more on humor than scares. I wish it took itself more seriously and went deeper into the horrors of a werewolf in a major city.
Splinter
(3 and 1/2 stars)
   For an independent film, they definitely knew how to work on a limited budget. With only a few locations and most of the movie taking place at a gas station, the film, especially the effects appear to look like big budget Hollywood. The main difference, this movie mainly focused on creating 3-dimensional characters as opposed to pounding grotesque horror scenes down the audiences’ throat. There were quite a few cringe worthy parts, but it all fit perfectly within the context of the film.
 
   The splinter creatures were disturbingly twisted due to their ability to infect living organisms with their spikes and transform animals or humans into highly deformed spike wobbling things. It was especially discomforting and slightly funny when a person infected loses a body part and that body part functions on its own. Acting at a cellular level, this body part would stop at no end to infect another living creature. 
   Trapped in a gas station, the main characters had no where to run and no way of contacting the outside world. As a viewer, I felt claustrophobia engulfing my mind. It was as if the walls of the small gas station were closing in and when it appeared like help had arrived or there was a possible means to an end, the walls squeezed the characters tighter. Splinter did an excellent job of building tension and keeping the viewer immersed in the action and drama throughout the duration of the film.
   The Breakdown: Intense film featuring a creeptastic creature. Plenty of horror filled moments that will keep you entertained and clutching the person’s arm next to yours until it becomes slightly discolored. Oh yes, it’s one of THOSE movies.